CoursesMetaphysics of Race (NEW)
PHIL 4510/PHIL6510, Section 401

Metaphysics of Race (NEW)

Historically, philosophical questions about race have been about what race is and whether it exists, the nature of racism, and social or political questions related to race or racism. This course focuses squarely on what race is and whether it exists. The first part of the course will focus on race theories and race-related debates by biologists, anthropologists, and philosophers of biology. The second part of the course will focus on race theories from philosophers of race and sociologists about race from an ordinary folk perspective.
Instructor(s)
  • Quayshawn Spencer
Semester

Spring 2026

Register
M 1:45pm-4:44pm

We will begin by looking at biological race theories from Francois Bernier in 1684 to J.F. Blumenbach in 1795. Next, we will study the epistemological debate about Samuel Morton’s craniometry. Finally, we will explore folk race theories from W.E.B. DuBois in 1897 to present-day work from philosophers of race like Sally Haslanger, Michael Hardimon, and Joshua Glasgow. Topics covered will include, but not be limited to, classical biological race theories, experimentation and measurement in race science, biological anti-realism about race, biological realism about race, non-biological realism about race, and meta-metaphysical issues about race theory.

Related Content

Other Courses of Interest

COGS 4001

The Cognitive Science of Conversation

Instructor(s)

  • Nora Bradford

Semester

Spring 2027

What makes a conversation “good”? How do we achieve the feeling of being “on the same page” with an interlocutor? This course explores the neurological and cognitive underpinnings of effective communication, equipping students with the scientific knowledge necessary to foster constructive dialogue. 

 

Learn More
BENF 2240

The Crisis of Expertise

Instructor(s)

  • Tal Arbel

Semester

Spring 2027

In recent years, there has been intensive talk about a “crisis of expertise” unfolding in liberal-democratic societies. Along with suspicion toward established facts and institutional findings, techno-scientific experts – academic researchers, medical doctors, engineers, public health specialists – are widely seen as detached elites whose impartiality is questionable, and motivations can no longer be trusted. This concerning shift in public attitudes, the argument goes, has boosted the popularity of unverified and unregulated sources of knowledge (traditional healing practices, the wellness industry, social media influencers, self-tracking), and given rise to a dangerous “do your own research” (DYOR) culture that impedes our collective ability to distinguish sound advice from misinformation.

Learn More