EngagePerspectivesEvent RecapConservative Writer David French Gives his Perspective on Political Division in the United States
Citizenship Icon Dialogue Icon

Conservative Writer David French Gives his Perspective on Political Division in the United States

The most politically engaged Americans are becoming “dangerously polarized,” even as the “exhausted majority” of Americans opt out of political discussion altogether, writer David French told a Penn audience recently in a Zoom event sponsored by the Red and Blue Exchange (RBX).

headshot of David French

French, an evangelical Christian who is senior editor of the TheDispatch.com and just launched a newsletter for The Atlantic called The Third Rail, spoke from the basement of his home in Franklin, Tenn.  He described his community as one of America’s “landslide districts” – in this case tilting deep red.  These pockets of political uniformity are spawned, he said, by our accelerating tendency to sort ourselves geographically by culture and political outlook.

French said many Americans are unfamiliar with, fearful of and alienated from people who differ with them politically. Therefore, he said, he’s become concerned that secession, a breaking apart of America, has become a real possibility.

“A few years ago, when I first began writing about this, people thought I was a loon for warning about it,” he said.  “Now, a lot of people of saying:  I think it might happen. Some are saying: I want it to happen, which is a whole different conversation.”

Paradoxically, French said, one way to avert the catastrophe of secession might be to curb our habit of talking about everyday politics in catastrophic terms.

“Even though I worry about secession, I spend a lot of time telling people to chill out; that not everything is as big a crisis as you think it is,” he said. “We need to calm down about the day-to-day give-and-take of politics.  We need to guard against catastrophism, saying things like: America is over if this candidate wins.  This constant exaggeration of the stakes of every political dispute is making people angry, putting them on edge. It makes them more vulnerable to misinformation and to claims that the world is crashing down around them, making extreme responses justified.”

Citing “seeds of hope,” French said he sees signs that enough people in the “exhausted majority” are so sick and tired of polarized rhetoric and media cocoons that they are moving from “alienated to motivated.”

“They are saying: We’ve got to figure this out. We’ve got to find a way to live together in a 51-49, or a 53-47 world. … They understand America is too diverse, too pluralistic, to have unanimity. You can’t eliminate conflict: you have to learn how to manage it.”

After giving a talk of 30 minutes, French had a dialogue with three Penn students affiliated with RBX, which is an initiative of the SNF Paideia Program.  The students – Charles Ross, Connor Gibson, and Lindsey Perlman – chatted with French about free speech issues on campus, ways that media profit incentives fuel polarization, and how to accept the costs that might come with speaking your mind in a polarized atmosphere.

Then French spent the final half hour answering questions on a variety of topics posed by the Zoom audience.

Some other memorable quotes from French:

  • “Norms change rapidly in polarized communities. If you’re in the middle of these rapid changes, it seems normal and logical. You experience this change as enlightenment. But from the outside it can seem strange, exotic even bizarre. This happened in conservative circles, where people I know went very swiftly from holding their nose in order to vote for Donald Trump to piloting the third boat in the boat parade.”
  • “Negative partisanship is when you hate or fear your opponent more than you have love for your own side.”
  • “We have two warring tribes constantly being fed a stream of horrible news by their media cocoons: with no brake on it. The vulnerability to believe wildly irresponsible things does not spring out of nowhere. It begins with enabling lies, a background of untruth, which then makes people vulnerable to activating lies.”
  • “If you’re part of the political class of America – the more you are very engaged politically and consume a lot of political media – the chances are that you’re more wrong about your political opponents. You tend to believe they are more extreme than they really are and that they hate you for more than they actually do.”

The Red and Blue Exchange’s mission is to promote civil dialogue and viewpoint diversity on the Penn campus and beyond. It does so by holding speaker events such as this one and the regular student dialogue events known as Can We Talk?

If you like this content and want more, follow us on social media and subscribe to our listserv.


Keep Reading


Statement from The Task Force on Support to Asian and Asian-American Students and Scholars (TAASS)

Recent racist comments made by a member of the faculty in our university's Law School have caused hurt and harm in the community.  Dean Ruger’s response and organizing efforts by students remind us that racist comments and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes do not reflect the values of our broader community. The Task Force joins the University and community members in condemning hateful speech. These events underscore the continued need for the University to identify and demonstrate commitment to meeting the needs of Asian and Asian American students, scholars, and community members as well as other targeted and structurally marginalized communities. The Task Force invites the Penn community to share perspectives on what resources and supports would better serve to uplift and improve Asian and Asian American experiences in both the short and long term.  Contact the task force through the Office of Social Equity and Community  Learn More

The Force of the Weaker Argument

I suppose we’re bound to see things this way. But we can view our opponents’ arguments as weaker than our own without dismissing them… Learn More
Bettina L. Love

Abolitionist Teaching and Learning with Bettina L. Love

In We Want to Do More than Survive, Love argues for a pedagogy that actively works towards radically restructuring and reimagining the prevailing educational model in the U.S. This pedagogy, which Love calls “abolitionist teaching,” is devoted to intersectional racial justice in and beyond the classroom through civics education, community coalition building, and critical theory. She refers to recent high-profile events and activism related to racial injustice; academic research in education; abolitionist histories; critical theory; and her own experiences as a Black, queer, female student and educator to make this argument.Learn More