EngagePerspectivesConservative Writer David French Gives his Perspective on Political Division in the United States
Citizenship Icon Dialogue Icon

Conservative Writer David French Gives his Perspective on Political Division in the United States

The most politically engaged Americans are becoming “dangerously polarized,” even as the “exhausted majority” of Americans opt out of political discussion altogether, writer David French told a Penn audience recently in a Zoom event sponsored by the Red and Blue Exchange (RBX).

headshot of David French

French, an evangelical Christian who is senior editor of the TheDispatch.com and just launched a newsletter for The Atlantic called The Third Rail, spoke from the basement of his home in Franklin, Tenn.  He described his community as one of America’s “landslide districts” – in this case tilting deep red.  These pockets of political uniformity are spawned, he said, by our accelerating tendency to sort ourselves geographically by culture and political outlook.

French said many Americans are unfamiliar with, fearful of and alienated from people who differ with them politically. Therefore, he said, he’s become concerned that secession, a breaking apart of America, has become a real possibility.

“A few years ago, when I first began writing about this, people thought I was a loon for warning about it,” he said.  “Now, a lot of people of saying:  I think it might happen. Some are saying: I want it to happen, which is a whole different conversation.”

Paradoxically, French said, one way to avert the catastrophe of secession might be to curb our habit of talking about everyday politics in catastrophic terms.

“Even though I worry about secession, I spend a lot of time telling people to chill out; that not everything is as big a crisis as you think it is,” he said. “We need to calm down about the day-to-day give-and-take of politics.  We need to guard against catastrophism, saying things like: America is over if this candidate wins.  This constant exaggeration of the stakes of every political dispute is making people angry, putting them on edge. It makes them more vulnerable to misinformation and to claims that the world is crashing down around them, making extreme responses justified.”

Citing “seeds of hope,” French said he sees signs that enough people in the “exhausted majority” are so sick and tired of polarized rhetoric and media cocoons that they are moving from “alienated to motivated.”

“They are saying: We’ve got to figure this out. We’ve got to find a way to live together in a 51-49, or a 53-47 world. … They understand America is too diverse, too pluralistic, to have unanimity. You can’t eliminate conflict: you have to learn how to manage it.”

After giving a talk of 30 minutes, French had a dialogue with three Penn students affiliated with RBX, which is an initiative of the SNF Paideia Program.  The students – Charles Ross, Connor Gibson, and Lindsey Perlman – chatted with French about free speech issues on campus, ways that media profit incentives fuel polarization, and how to accept the costs that might come with speaking your mind in a polarized atmosphere.

Then French spent the final half hour answering questions on a variety of topics posed by the Zoom audience.

Some other memorable quotes from French:

  • “Norms change rapidly in polarized communities. If you’re in the middle of these rapid changes, it seems normal and logical. You experience this change as enlightenment. But from the outside it can seem strange, exotic even bizarre. This happened in conservative circles, where people I know went very swiftly from holding their nose in order to vote for Donald Trump to piloting the third boat in the boat parade.”
  • “Negative partisanship is when you hate or fear your opponent more than you have love for your own side.”
  • “We have two warring tribes constantly being fed a stream of horrible news by their media cocoons: with no brake on it. The vulnerability to believe wildly irresponsible things does not spring out of nowhere. It begins with enabling lies, a background of untruth, which then makes people vulnerable to activating lies.”
  • “If you’re part of the political class of America – the more you are very engaged politically and consume a lot of political media – the chances are that you’re more wrong about your political opponents. You tend to believe they are more extreme than they really are and that they hate you for more than they actually do.”

The Red and Blue Exchange’s mission is to promote civil dialogue and viewpoint diversity on the Penn campus and beyond. It does so by holding speaker events such as this one and the regular student dialogue events known as Can We Talk?

If you like this content and want more, follow us on social media and subscribe to our listserv.

Subscribe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep Reading

young woman smiling at camera in lab in front of computers and equipment.
Blog

Balancing Wellness and Building Dialogue Skills as a Scientist

Reflecting back on my summer at Penn, I am grateful for the opportunities that I were graciously given to enhance both my career and… Learn More
young woman with short brown hair smiling at the camera standing in lobby of office building
Blog

The More You Know: Intellectual Humility in Clinical Mental Health and Dialogue Practices

Any Penn student worth their salt knows how to bluff. Bluff that they’ve certainly started that 15-page paper due Tuesday. Bluff that… Learn More
three student researchers testing the waters by collecting samples in Kenya
Blog

Utooni Sand Dams as Beacons of Hope and the Transformative Power of Collective Action

After the chilliness of the morning all but evaporated, I found myself climbing into a cavernous riverbed. Behind me, lay our matatu, a… Learn More