CoursesFailure to Communicate
ENGL 2145 / CIMS 2145

Failure to Communicate

The phrase “failure to communicate” became iconic in American English from the 1967 film “Cool Hand Luke,” in which Paul Newman played a convict who refuses to listen or follow orders. The film raised questions about the multiple ways we understand “failure to communicate” and its consequences. Is it sometimes a decision to resist a presumption, a premise, an interpretation, an argument, a directive from authority? Is it at other times simply a mechanical failure? This course examines “failure to communicate” in multiple cultural areas, among them literature, romance, politics, show business, law, science, war, psychology, philosophy, business, religion, humor and education.

Mondays, 7 pm – 10 pm

In addition to our manageable reading in nonfiction, journalism and scholarship, we watch 24 movies (no cost to you) and bring literary, philosophical, psychological and historical perspectives to these issues. We’ll be grappling with literary fiction (e.g., works by Herman Melville and Toni Morrison) and theater (e.g., “A Chorus Line”) as well as film (e.g., “Cyrano,” “I Am Sam,” “A Quiet Passion” and “The Wolf of Wall Street”).

We’ll also experiment, trying some role-playing communication exercises with students: e.g., a couple breaking up, a U.S. general talking to a Russian general, a novelist trying to explain to an editor why some material shouldn’t be cut, a back-and-forth between a stopped driver and a police officer. Finally, we’ll ask whether failure to communicate is always a bad thing, as well as how to avoid its worst consequences.

I took Failure to Communicate to fill a psych requirement and for a pre-med English class and it surpassed my expectations. ~ Amelia Demopoulo, C’23

Requirements: a 6-page midterm paper, a 15-page final paper, 10 short (up to two paragraphs) ungraded critical comments on assigned reading or viewing over the term, and active participation in class discussion. This course counts as a “Cognitive Elective” for Psychology majors toward credit in the Psychology major. It also counts for credit toward requirements in the Philosophy and Communication majors.

Please contact Professor Carlin Romano if you have any questions at cromano@asc.upenn.edu

This was one of the most enjoyable courses I’ve taken at Penn. The movies were great and being able to discuss and analyze issues of communication was always a fun and rewarding process. ~William Locke, C’23

Related Content

Other Courses of Interest

ANTH 3100/ANTH5100

Middle Passages and Returns (NEW)

Instructor(s)

  • Deborah Thomas

Semester

Fall 2025

This course will engage students in questions of slavery, indentured labor, migration, and repair through the conceptual frameworks of middle passages and returns. We will collectively investigate the routes and roots through which and from which people have traveled back and forth between African, Asian, and American sites in order to ask complicated questions about travel, conscription, labor, spirituality, and self-narration. How do we think about the complex trajectories that brought Africans and Asians to the Americas?  How do we excavate lesser known inter- and intra-continental circulations? In what ways is return theoretically and methodologically im/possible? How has repair been envisioned?

Learn More
ECON 0460

Economics and Theories of Fairness (NEW)

Instructor(s)

  • Michael T. Kane
  • Sarah L. H. Gronningsater

Semester

Fall 2025

Free markets excel at producing wealth, but seem to do so at the cost of economic inequality. Is this inequality unjust? Is it a problem economics and public policy should solve? Liberal democracies have traditionally had the protection of private property as a core mandate. But they also have varying degrees of redistribution in order to fund social welfare systems. How can we reconcile these objectives which seem to conflict? Is the protection of individual rights more important than the promotion of the greatest good for all? To what extent can personal liberty and the common good be reconciled?

Learn More