EngagePerspectivesCan We Talk?: Students Exchange Views on Bubbles, Climate, and Socialism
Dialogue Icon

Can We Talk?: Students Exchange Views on Bubbles, Climate, and Socialism

Below are some of the topics that 35 college students from around the Philadelphia region discussed on Feb. 12 in the first Can We Talk? dialogue of the year. It was held in the Hall of Flags inside Houston Hall on the Penn campus and drew participants from Drexel, Eastern and Salus Universities, Haverford College, the University of the Arts and, of course, Penn.

Students gather for an event
Students from regional colleges gather in the Hall of Flags for the first Can We Talk? event.

What bubbles do you live in and how you can break free of them—or at least expand them? How does the household you grew up in shape your political views now? What’s your No. 1 issue in this 2020 election, what do you want to see done about it—and what’s the best argument against your position?

Although we came to the table with different backgrounds and beliefs, we were able to discuss important issues and ask thoughtful questions to keep the conversation going.

– Penn Student

Penn student shares her views with others at her table.
Penn student shares her views with others at her table.
Ground Rules for Civil Dialogue

After a review of eight ground rules for the conversation and an ice-breaking exercise where students chatted with one another about the “multiple identities” that define who they are, participants dug into a sequence of questions about their values and views. The ground rules challenged them to listen well, ask good, clarifying questions of one another, and be willing to acknowledge gaps in their own knowledge and doubts about their own views.

How to Puncture Social Bubbles

A question about identifying and puncturing the bubbles in which people live generated some probing, candid discussions. Among the bubbles people identified were campus, race, class, income, hometown, field of study, political party, social media habits.

Differing views were presented in civil ways and discussed properly.

– Eastern U. Student

The students proposed a variety of strategies for expanding or getting outside comfortable bubbles:
  • Understanding how social media algorithms enforce bubbles and seeking to counter that.
  • Taking your headphones off and paying attention to what’s around you as you walk or ride on your morning commute.
  • Speaking up and asking questions when you’re in an unfamiliar place.
  • Being intentional about joining new organizations and visiting new places.
  • Suspending judgment when you meet someone.
Discussing Tough Topics Like Climate Change

Climate change got the most play during the table discussions of issues, followed by health care equity, income inequality, criminal justice reform, immigration, and gun violence. A meta-issue loomed over the discussion of all those issues. The students returned again and again to the relative merits of capitalism vs. socialism, with socialism defined by the young voters who espoused it as something similar to the Bernie Sanders/Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez program.

Students gather at a table to share ideas
Several students from different colleges exchange ideas.

My takeaways: The value of questioning your own opinion. The value of fully listening without judgment.

– CCP Student

Here’s a sampling of memorable points made during the issue discussions:
  • Presidential candidates too often deploy issues simply as “selling points,” without delving meaningful into them.
  • There’s not enough attention to “who loses out?” when a new program is proposed like Medicare for All or a standard income.
  • “How do I convince someone that another person’s life is worth worrying about?”
  • Climate change is the “most pressing” issue of all, but it’s frustrating how much false information gets poured out as reliable sources become less prominent.
  • If you believe in free enterprise and low taxation, but also believe morals matter, a choice between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders is a very unappetizing one.
  • How do you reinstate the positive narrative about immigration that used to be the official story of America, but no longer is?
  • The amount of control that corporations exert over society is deeply troubling. Criminal justice is a good example. There is no way that private, for-profit entities should be running prisons.
Girl wearing hat at a table writing
There is time for students to reflect internally throughout the dialogue process.

Based on self-descriptions on surveys, the students’ political orientations ranged from “libertarian” through “conservative” and “liberal” to “socialist,” with the left side of the political spectrum more amply represented.

Keep Reading

Event Recap

Skillshare: Scholarly Writing & Civic Tech

Kaitlyn is the author of “The Public Sector Pivot: How Gen Z Will Lead a Renaissance in Public Service”, which discusses the role of young people in the public sector post-pandemic, and how to improve the public sector talent pipeline for college students.  To write her book, Kaitlyn interviewed dozens of passionate people who work in government to tell stories about motivations to enter the public sector and potential areas of growth, such as civic tech.Learn More
Event Recap

Biology & Public Interest: A Fireside Chat

The PIT@Penn student group recently held a fireside chat with Dr. Kayla Davis and Dr. George Demiris, who are both work in the intersection between public interest tech and biology.  Dr. Davis has been heavily involved in STEM outreach and science policy, while much of Dr. Demiris’ work focuses on research to use tech solutions to address aging related issues.Learn More
Podcast

Communities of Practice at Penn: Restorative Practice

Our final episode in the series on communities of practice features a conversation between Dr. Lia Howard and Pablo Cerdera, associate director of Restorative Practices at the University of Pennsylvania. Pablo shares about how he and his colleagues at Restorative Practices work to provide a safe, confidential, supportive space for all parties involved in incidents of harm. He talks about circle practice as a way of strengthening connections in a community to prevent harm as well as to endure conflict when it inevitably happens.Learn More